Cases 1 - 10 of 630
Jesus Rivera, et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 24-11311
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA, SIAKA MASSAQUOI, GREGORY PURDY, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, DIRECTOR OF F.B. I., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FELIPE-PEGUERO v. PURDY et al
as 2:2024cv04750
Plaintiff:
JUAN E. FELIPE-PEGUERO
Defendant:
JONATHAN D. PURDY, GLOBALSOFT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. and JOHN DOES #1 TO #20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Chien Tran v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 8:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Chien Tran
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America and Erica Purdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Dominique Brown
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Unknown Purdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States v. Jeffrey Purdy
as 24-1660
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
(PC) Coleman v. Goff et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Andrew Coleman and Andrew James Coleman
Defendant:
Alexander Goff, Karina Golosinskiy, Lucas Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Anthony Purdis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
