Cases 1 - 10 of 3,680
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hall
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #18921, Andrew King, Lisa Stone and others
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
as 2:2024cv06095
Plaintiff:
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC, JONATHAN RUHNKE, ORCHID BELLEFANTIE and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eric Bowers v. BCG Attorney Search, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03944
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
BCG Attorney Search, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howe #303244 v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Charles Howe
Defendant:
Lupe Reyes, Christine Johnston, Catherine Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner:
Arthur Miles
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS et al v. BOWERS
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS and MARY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
