Cases 1 - 10 of 6,150
Edmunds Lewis v. City of Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Megan C. Edmunds Lewis
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheckles v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Megan J Sheckles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Barrett, Joseph Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills et al v. USA
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Megan Mills and Joshua Mills
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Geiger et al v. Gennifer & Stephanie, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Dessie Pilek, Jessica Hinton, Megan Vogt and others
Defendant:
Gennifer & Stephanie, Inc., Maria Aguilar and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Hall v. Anderson et al
as 3:2024cv05455
Plaintiff:
Junaid Ramsey Hall
Defendant:
Eileen Anderson, Ruth Muuru, Megan Hamel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPANSKY v. FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPALITY et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPALITY, JUDICIAL ASSISTANT JULIE JOHNSON, ATTORNEY JOSEPH SCHMITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Lawson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams
Defendant:
Angela Lawson, Megan Fulghum, Valicia White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tenge v. Stauffer et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Trevor Adam Tenge
Defendant:
Roseanne Maureen Stauffer, Megan Tenge and Marrissa Echart
Fehrenbach v. Dreamland Baby Co.
as 3:2024cv03406
Plaintiff:
Megan Fehrenbach
Defendant:
Dreamland Baby Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
