Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jerome Meraz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darmartress Collins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Rothstein et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bart Butler and Permits Express USA LLC
Defendant:
Michael Rothstein, Custom Construction of Carroll County, LLC and Kelli Shockey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Shockey v. Cox et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ira Shockey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Cox, Correctional Officer Walters, Correctional Officer Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockey v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20438
Plaintiff:
Dawn Shockey
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kurtz, Jr. et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Robert Kurtz, Jr., Kurtz Tool and Die Co., Inc., Curt McAfee and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Peterson v. Berkley County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Ashley Peterson
Defendant:
Berkley County Sheriff's Department, Berkley County Commission, N. Chronister and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SHOCKEY v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22641
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE SHOCKEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Shockey
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Cody Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Ryan R. Shockey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
