Cases 91 - 100 of 4,605
Mann v. Laroque et al
as 2:2023cv08237
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mann
Defendant:
Natasha, Laroque, Ahmed, Masuma, Michael, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Young et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Obbissit et al
as 1:2023cv05928
Plaintiff:
Maurice Darrell Hooker
Defendant:
Michael D. Obbissit, Terra Rollins, Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Royal v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Royal
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, Rajvinder Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Tony Manns
as 24-5053
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TONY MANNS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jeannette Santini v. Jason Rucker
as 23-2180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANNETTE SANTINI
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON S. RUCKER, Judge, RAYMOND FRANCIS MORROGH, Counsel, WILLIAM JAMES MINOR, JR., Judge and others
Thompson v. US Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Defendant:
US Bank, Andy Cecere, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Nordlicht (Small)
as 24-46
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SMALL
Defendant:
MARK NORDLICHT, DAVID LEVY, URI LANDESMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
