Cases 1 - 10 of 9,840
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Defendant:
Michael C Subit and Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. et al v. Knudsen
as 9:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Free Speech Coalition, Inc., Deep Connection Technologies, Inc., Charyn Pfeuffer and others
Defendant:
Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Peterson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Cristen Rose Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ReliaStar Life Insurance Company v. Dakota Business Lending et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ReliaStar Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dakota Business Lending and Peterson Hospitality, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Harold Peterson and Lindsey Peterson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Dominguez v. Bachofer et al
as 4:2024cv02904
Plaintiff:
Elijah Dominguez
Defendant:
Mark Bachofer, Kerry Kip, Alison Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
