Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Collette Peters, Michael Aubin and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Raymond I. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Collette Peters, North Central Regional Office Director, Warden FCI Englewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASAWAY et al v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
MR. JUSTIN C GASAWAY, MR. PAUL D AUBIN, MR. DYLLON WARE and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY JAIL, JOHN PLASSE, JOHN DOE, 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solano v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2020cv01378
Defendant:
Correction Officer A. Aubin, Correction Officer Taft, The Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Solano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUBIN v. USA
as 1:2020cv00709
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
PATRICK JEAN AUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Liberte v. Cothran
as 0:2019cv02706
Respondent:
Richard Cothran
Petitioner:
Aubin Liberte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anselmo v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 9:2019cv00350
Defendant:
Keysor, Gregory Cassidy, John McIntyre and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Anselmo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubin v. Beasley
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jean Aubin
Defendant:
Gene Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garrett v. Ablashi et al
as 1:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Angela Regina Garrett
Defendant:
D.K. Ablashi, A.A. Chilton, R.R. McEwain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
