Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2018cv02468
Defendant:
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and DM Arbor Court, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Williams, Sharobin White, Dinah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. West Virginia State Police et al
as 5:2016cv09002
Plaintiff:
Amanda Williams
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police, C. R. Smithers, T. D. Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Copper Rose Community Management et al
as 4:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
Southwest Fair Housing Council
Defendant:
Copper Rose Community Management, Amanda Williams, Denise Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. City of Jackson, Mississippi
as 3:2016cv00367
Plaintiff:
Amanda Williams
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mangram v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lamont Mangram
Defendant:
Amanda Williams and Bruce Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01734
FEDEX:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
