Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
In re: McIntosh County, Georgia v. Sarah Drayton, et al
as 22-11298
Petitioner:
In re: MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA
Respondent:
SARAH FRANCES DRAYTON, CAROLYN BANKS, MELVIN BANKS, SR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Dixon v. The Edgewood Group Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2020cv00491
Defendant:
The Edgewood Group Limited Partnership also known as The Edgewood Group, Ltd. doing business as Edgewood Villas Apartments, The Mitchell Company, LLC, Cumberland Real Estate Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. LEMON et al
as 3:2018cv00184
Defendant:
LEXI LEMON and STEVE STURGIS
Plaintiff:
ANDREA DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton, Carolyn Banks, Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04274
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton , Carolyn Banks , Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
