Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Andrew Lucas v. S. Evans, Jr., et al
as 17-60081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. LAVON EVANS, JR. and S. LAVON EVANS, JR. OPERATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Berlin v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv06046
Plaintiff:
Monica Berlin
Defendant:
LinkedIn, ProTech Security, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Evans et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lucas
Defendant:
S. Lavon Evans, Jr. and S. Lavon Evans, Jr Operating Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Andrew Luca
as 15-2153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW LUCAS
FRITZ et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
NOALA FRITZ , DANIEL FRITZ , ETHAN FRITZ and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and IRANIAN JOHN DOES #1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Higgs v. Stafford Easterling, et al
as 13-6374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CARL HIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFFORD EASTERLING, Attorney, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner, COOKIE CREWS, Warden, Warden and others
HARRIS et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HARRIS, III and ADRIANE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. , SUNTRUST BANKS INC. , SUNTRUST BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lucas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv02497
Plaintiff:
Phillip Andrew Lucas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Higgs v. Easterling et al
as 3:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Carl Higgs
Defendant:
Stafford Easterling, LaDonna Thompson, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04601
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lucas
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
