Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Petrick v. City Of Austin
as 1:2026cv02082
Plaintiff:
Michael Petrick
Defendant:
City Of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Malman Law et al
as 1:2026cv08884
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Ameera Greene
Defendant:
Malman Law, Steve Malman, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRACKLEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02633
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRACKLEY, JESSICA BUSTLE, JOSHUA BUSTLE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hudson v. Clarke County et al
as 2:2026cv00106
Plaintiff:
Danny Raylee Hudson
Defendant:
Clarke County and Austin Cochran
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANATA v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER AUTOMOTIVE PLC et al
as 2:2026cv09371
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GRANATA
Defendant:
JAGUAR LAND ROVER AUTOMOTIVE PLC and JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Birdow v. Mery
as 26-40450
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Mark Mery, Doctor of Dental Surgery, William G. McConnell Unit and Isaac Kwarteng, Doctor, Medical Director, William G. McConnell Unit
Davis v. King et al
as 9:2026cv00548
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Alisha King, Austin J. Swindle, B. Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lamont Laprade v. Western Regional Jail
as 26-6801
Plaintiff:
LAMONT LAPRADE
Defendant:
WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL, BOSWELL PHARMACY SERVICES LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
