Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Hill v. Reed et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Lay, Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00048
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Roy Griffin, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earles v. Moore et al
as 3:2018mc00035
Plaintiff:
Renwick Earles
Defendant:
Justin Moore, Daniel Pennington, Johnathan York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Krohn & Moss, LTD et al
as 1:2017cv01178
Defendant:
Ryan Lee, National Consumer Advocates, Inc., MB Investments & Consulting, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Navient Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HILL et al v. LAMB et al
as 4:2017cv00143
Defendant:
PAUL ANDRY, JOSHUA BABCOCK, JOHN DOE 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM HILL and WILLIAM SPRINKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Joseph Hafler et al v. County of San Luis Obispo et al
as 2:2017cv05183
Defendant:
Debbie Arnold, James A. Bergman, Lynn Compton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nicholaus Gray, Andrew Joseph Hafler, Douglas William Hysell and others
Thomas Arthur v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 17-11879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. ARTHUR
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANNE ADAMS HILL, General Counsel, Alabama Department of Corrections, in her official capacity and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Karen Velie v. Adam Hill, et al
as 17-55233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN VELIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM HILL, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO and DOES, 1 through 50
Karen Velie v. Adam Hill, et al
as 17-55233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN VELIE
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM HILL, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO and DOES, 1 through 50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
