Cases 1 - 10 of 1,627
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hartman v. State of Washington Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Sophie Hartman
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Kelsey Owens, Lauren Maulden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Adel Yamout v. Jeffry Scapa et al
as 2:2024cv02955
Plaintiff:
Adel Yamout
Defendant:
Jeffry Scapa and Asset Default Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheffield v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
Adele Sheffield
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cherif v. Quaranta et al
as 4:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Adel Cherif
Defendant:
Anthony Quaranta, Michael Amiri and Houston KP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
