Cases 1 - 10 of 34
NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin
as 5:2023cv05105
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Tim Griffin
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Americans Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas and Electronic Frontier Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROSSPOINT CHURCH v. MAKIN et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
CROSSPOINT CHURCH
Defendant:
A PENDER MAKIN, JEFFERSON ASHBY, EDWARD DAVID and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arizona Broadcasters Association et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Arizona Broadcasters Association, American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, Arizona Newspapers Association and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Rachel Mitchell and Paul Penzone
Amicus Curiae:
Central Arizona NLG, Southern Arizona NLG, Mass Liberation AZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NETCHOICE LLC et al v. MOODY et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, PATRICK GILLESPIE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION doing business as CCIA, NETCHOICE, LLC doing business as NETCHOICE and NETCHOICE LLC doing business as NETCHOICE
Amicus Curiae:
TECHFREEDOM, CHAMBER OF PROGRESS, CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marie Baptiste et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2020cv11335
Plaintiff:
Marie Baptiste, Mitchell Matorin and Jonathan Daponte
Defendant:
Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Gov. Charles Baker and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation, UMass Memorial Health Care, Inc., MLPB (F/K/A Medical Legal Partnership / Boston) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chelsea Collaborative, Inc., Springfield No One Leaves, City Life/Vida Urbana and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Michalakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Democratic National Committee et al v. Bostelmann, Marge et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Democratic National Committee and Democratic Party of Wisconsin
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Racine, Tony Evers, Dane County and others
Intervenor:
Wisconsin State Legislature
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY et al v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2019cv17807
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, INC. and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
MARGUERITE T. SIMON, STEPHEN M. HOLDEN, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarlstrom v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2017cv00652
Defendant:
Christopher D. Aldridge, William J. Boyd, Daren L. Cone and others
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mats Jarlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
