Cases 11 - 20 of 2,738
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ed Removal - Employment Discrimination
Franklin Hospital et al v. Vestis Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Franklin Hospital and Joyce Fletcher
Defendant:
Vestis Services, LLC and Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ayala v. Baltimore County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alejandro Ayala
Defendant:
Baltimore County Detention Center and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024mc00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard J Johnson
Garnishee:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
