Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Paixao v. City of Greenwood et al
as 4:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brenda Paixao
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, County of Leflore, Greenwood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Metropolitan Fire Protection Systems, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Fire Protection Systems, L.L.C. and Harrison B. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Flowers v. McQuay et al
as 3:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
Roy B Flowers
Defendant:
Michael Talley and Zachary McQuay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02853
Petitioner:
William B Flowers
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Descartes Financial Corp. v. Marie B. Flowers et al
as 2:2015cv08223
Plaintiff:
Descartes Financial Corp.
Defendant:
Marie B. Flowers and Natasia N. Flowers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC v. FLOWERS
as 1:2012cv00556
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC v. FLOWERS
as 1:2012mc00029
Movant:
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC.
Respondent:
WILLIAM B. FLOWERS
Perry v. Flowers
as 4:2012cv03095
Defendant:
Karen B. Flowers
Plaintiff:
Larry James Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
