Cases 41 - 50 of 5,865
Bryan Mick v. Barrett Gibbons, et al
as 24-1610
Plaintiff:
Bryan S. Mick, Personal Representative of the Estate of Print Zutavern, Deceased
Defendant:
Deputy Barrett Gibbons, in his individual and official capacities, Deputy Lawrence Stump, in his individual and official capacities, Sheriff Dan Osmond, in his individual and official capacities and others
Appellant:
Nebraska State Patrol
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELLSON-BARRETT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00437
Petitioner:
SALLY NELLSON-BARRETT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Brown v. Barrett et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Le'Derrick Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
William Barrett, Joshua Finkley, Kevin Jackson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Lloydell Barrett v. Martin OMalley
as 8:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lloydell Barrett
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carl Barrett v. Montrel Bridges, et al
as 24-1411
Plaintiff:
CARL BARRETT
Defendant:
MONTREL BRIDGES, RACHEL MATUSHAK, JOSEPH SPENCER and others
BARRETT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
KAREN BARRETT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Barrett, Joel v. United States Of America
as 9:2024cv80284
Plaintiff:
Joel Barrett
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
