Cases 41 - 50 of 290
Johnson v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01726
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Brian Johnson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Mark Reichel, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16781
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
McIntyre v. Collin Bryan Construction LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
William McIntyre
Defendant:
Collin Bryan Construction LLC and Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
