Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hall v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hall
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Medina v. Ancient Mystical Order Rosey Cross et al
as 8:2014cv00387
Defendant:
Ancient Mystical Order Rosey Cross, Beverly Hall Corporation and Rosicrucian Fellowship
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv00765
Plaintiff:
Tony Smith
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia, Atlanta Police Department, George Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States v. Hall et al
as 3:2008cv00416
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Beverly Hall, First Volunteer Bank of Tennessee, Michael G. Hatmaker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CLYMER v. BEVERLY HALL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01367
Plaintiff:
RONALD SWINBURNE CLYMER
Defendant:
BEVERLY HALL CORPORATION, THE IMPERIAL COUNCIL AND VENERATED ORDER OF MAGI, THE SPIRIT OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF LIGHT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv06490
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Frances Davis, Mildred Freeny and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia Corporation and G.D. Searle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall et al v. Bosworth
as 3:2007cv00386
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hall and Kevin Maynard
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bosworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
