Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Warnock v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Warnock
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Solomon Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stump et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Richard Stump, Jean Stump, Earl Stanley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kymell Pak v. Warden, et al
as 22-11080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYMELL PAK
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, JACOB BEASLEY, Deputy Warden Security Officer, Tier II, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JONES, Unit Manager and others
Hale v. Johnson
as 3:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winn v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03919
Petitioner:
Bobby Lewis Winn
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Winn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00460
Petitioner:
Bobby Lewis Winn
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pak v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Infirmary Doctor Dr. Jane/John Doe, Jacob Beasley, GCHC Nurses Doe 1 and 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Kymell Pak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunley v. McKinney et al
as 5:2021cv00287
Defendant:
Bobby Bowen, Javier Martinez, Wayne McKinney and others
Plaintiff:
Dekator Lane Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Stephens County, Bobby Lewis, Michael Eades and others
Plaintiff:
Rocky W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
