Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Wilson v. Cook et al
as 3:2026cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
Dale Cook, McCullum and Heyley Hooton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2026cv01347
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv08304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wilson v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02938
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC., NOVO HOLDINGS EQUITY US INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv07383
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE WILSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bobby Wilson v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
D. Samuel, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bertrand et al v. Jefferson Parish
as 2:2022cv01618
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bertrand, Simeon Bradley, Chanz Cook and others
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00610
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
