Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Potter v. Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Potter
Defendant:
Deuel Vocational Institution, Staal, R.S. Dulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Moon v. C. Reece, et al
as 13-16167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN MOON
Defendant - Appellee:
C. REECE, S. ESPARZA, G. METCAL and others
Tyler Eye Care, P.A. et al v. Conrey et al
as 6:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tyler Eye Care, P.A. , Tyler Hearing, LLC , Neshia R. Rudd and others
Defendant:
Brad Conrey , Brian Conrey , Teresa Conrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dunigan v. United States et al
as 2:2012cv03048
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
United States, People of the State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Reece et al
as 1:2012cv01243
Plaintiff:
Adrian Moon
Defendant:
C. Reece, S. Esparza, G. Metcal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. PSH&TC
as 6:2012cv01199
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Reece
Defendant:
PSH&TC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reece et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02847
Plaintiff:
Jody C Reece , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Askew et al v. Citgo Petroleum Corp et al
as 2:2010cv01510
Plaintiff:
Gloria Godette Askew, Rapheal Bargeman, Billy Joe Bell and others
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corp , Citgo Bayou Industrial Fuels Corp , Citgo East Coast Oil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Linden Graham v. Braugham, et al
as 10-16661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDEN WINSTON GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAUGHAM, Doctor and C. REECE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
