Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Wells et al v. Rice
as 2:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tyra Wells and Jeffrey Jarrell
Defendant:
Thomas C. Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seniw v. Cannavino et al
as 3:2020cv01405
Defendant:
Jane Does, United Services Automobile Association, Ryan Ryan Deluca LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Bohdan George Seniw
RICE et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12074
Plaintiff:
SARA A RICE, MARLIN C RICE, THE ESTATE OF SARA A. RICE and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seniw v. Bagwell et al
as 3:2020cv00881
Defendant:
Edward C. Rice, United Services Automobile Association, Katia Lee Bagwell and others
Plaintiff:
Bohdan George Seniw
Rice et al v. Steiner Brother Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02350
Defendant:
Steiner Brother Properties, LLC, Blue Hospitality, LLC, Steiner Brothers Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carrol C. Rice, Jr. and Ralph Johnstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCloud v. Rice,
as 4:2020cv00004
Defendant:
C. Rice
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rice v. Rice et al
as 0:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Annelise C. Rice
Defendant:
Brent Roger Rice , Hennepin County , Carver County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Morris v. Tammy Dickman, et al
as 17-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TAMMY DICKMAN, DAVID C. RICE and DIANE M. FREMGEN
Moore v. Joyner et al
as 5:2017ct03044
Plaintiff:
Brice C. Moore
Defendant:
Carlton Joyner, S.B. Waddell, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
