Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Freeman v. Tibbals
as 1:2012cv02557
Petitioner:
Charles Freeman
Respondent:
Terry A. Tibbals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman, et al v. Town of Hudson, et al
as 12-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES FREEMAN and DANIELA FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HUDSON, MA, TOWN OF HUDSON CONSERVATION COMMITTEE, TOWN OF HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Freeman
as 1:2011cv04335
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Charles Freeman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Peters v. Kilbride et al
as 1:2011cv07431
Plaintiff:
Antoine Peters
Defendant:
Thomas L. Kilbride, Charles Freeman, Robert Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. Pawlicki
as 4:2011cv00393
Plaintiff:
William E Ross, III, Buster Keaton and Charles Freeman
Defendant:
J Pawlicki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman et al v. Town of Hudson et al
as 1:2011cv10432
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman and Daniella Freeman
Defendant:
Town of Hudson, Town of Hudson Police Department, Town of Hudson Conservation Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. City of Corpus Christi Texas et al
as 2:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Pedro Cortez Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi Texas , Raymond A Hullman and Charles Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Freeman v. Canadian National Illinois Centr
as PAE/2:10-CV-61783
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Canadian National Illinois Centr
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans et al v. Carlson Electrical Construction, LLC
as 3:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans, Donald L. Adams, Fred Moore and others
Defendant:
Carlson Electrical Construction, LLC
FREEMAN v. CANADIAN NATIONAL ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv61783
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FREEMAN
Defendant:
CANADIAN NATIONAL ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
