Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Price v. Jones et al
as 0:2018cv62369
Defendant:
Julie Jones and Pamela Jo Bondi
Plaintiff:
Charles Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FONTANGE v. PRICE et al
as 2:2016cv09095
Plaintiff:
CARINE FONTANGE
Defendant:
CHARLES PRICE , FORWARD AIR FREIGHT , JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henry v. Strange et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00872
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Defendant:
Todd Strange, N. T. Buce, Charles Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellinger-Locke et al v. Strange et al
as 2:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
Maggie Ellinger-Locke and Marijuana Policy Project
Defendant:
Luther Strange , Daryl Bailey , Jerry L. Fielding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. JONES et al
as 4:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HENDERSON
Defendant:
JENA JONES, CREIGHTON, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE et al v. GATOR LAUREL PARTNERS, LLLP et al
as 2:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
DIANA PRICE and CHARLES PRICE
Defendant:
GATOR LAUREL PARTNERS, LLLP, GATOR LAUREL FLEA MARKET, LLC, GATOR LAUREL MALL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01023
Plaintiff:
Charles Price
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
