Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
Lebron Copeland
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Comanche County Facilities Authority , James T Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chilcote et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04531
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chilcote and Lovell Chilcote
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chilcote v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Michalyn Chilcote
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Chilcote v. Unknown
as 3:2017cv00061
Petitioner:
Ryan Chilcote
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chilcote v. Marion County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv02042
Defendant:
Deputy (A252), Deputy (A284), Deputy Sgt. K. Abraham and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Chilcote
A14:
Deputy Lt. Cox
A207:
Deputy Dunbar
A317:
Deputy Frieze
829), (826), (839:
Medical Staff
A27:
Sgt. Peterson
A253:
Deputy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. King County
as 2:2016cv01146
Plaintiff:
Ermundo Chilcote Ortiz
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yaconis v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Yaconis
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Incorporated, Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
