Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Martin v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00832
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Clay Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, City, County, Commission of Elmore County, Alabama, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman, Richard Clay Martin, Aloysius Thaddeus Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay Martin Burt Murray v. Marcus Pollard
as 2:2020cv08775
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard
Petitioner:
Clay Martin Burt Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Commissioner, Social Secuirty Adminstration
as 4:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Horace Clay Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02909
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
O'Neal v. Abbeville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Steven O'Neal
Defendant:
Abbeville County Sheriff's Department , Mathew Graham , John Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Abbeville County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
John Martin
Defendant:
Abbeville County Sheriffs Department , Matthew Graham , John Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Abbeville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2014cv00396
Plaintiff:
Brandon Martin
Defendant:
Abbeville County Sheriff's Department , Matthew Graham , John Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LORE, et al v. WILKES, et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD LORE, JR. and ANGELA LORE
Defendant:
SANDRA WILKES, KRIS SAPPER, KEVIN AUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
