Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Burton v. White County Jail et al
as 4:2026cv00678
Plaintiff:
Darren James Burton
Defendant:
White County Jail, Nelson, Creech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Polk County, Texas
as 9:2026cv00511
Plaintiff:
Clayton Johnson
Defendant:
Polk County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarrette v. Clayton et al
as 1:2026cv01283
Plaintiff:
Tomas Navarrette
Defendant:
Jason Clayton and Home Run Maintenance & Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Reed et al
as 5:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
Michael Tillman
Defendant:
Clayton Straughn, Jeorge Gamez, David Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayende v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2026cv01361
Plaintiff:
Zuaury Ayende
Defendant:
City of Buffalo and Clayton P. Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Clayton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv00231
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Clayton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rankin v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv06695
Plaintiff:
Clayton Rankin
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clayton v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv06738
Plaintiff:
Juaniki Clayton
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
