Cases 21 - 30 of 32
St. Louis County v. Johnson
as 4:2015cv00746
Plaintiff:
St. Louis County
Defendant:
Carol Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
St. Louis County v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Defendant:
Carl Johnson and Carol Johnson
Plaintiff:
St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
Doe et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv11858
Plaintiff:
Zachary A. Doe and Alice D. Roe
Defendant:
Carol Johnson , Gregory G. Groover , Marchelle Raynor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson Travis v. Officer Beard
as 6:2010cv01366
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson Travis
Defendant:
Officer Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simone Brooks v. School District Central Dauphi, et al
as 10-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIMONE BROOKS, On Behalf of K.B.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL DAUPHIN, CAROL JOHNSON and ADMINISTRATION
Azubuko et al v. Skerritt et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Chisom O. Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Rachel Skerritt, Carol Johnson, Paul Iantosca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Central Dauphin School District et al
as 1:2009cv02482
Plaintiff:
Simone Brooks
Defendant:
Central Dauphin School District, Carol Johnson and Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Azubuko et al v. Skerritt et al
as 3:2009mc00394
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Chisom O. Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Rachel Skerritt, Carol Johnson, Paul Iantosca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
