Cases 1 - 10 of 18
WALLACE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11634
Plaintiff:
CAROL WALLACE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin Elliott Green
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, David Shinn, John Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hurt v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Devona Clark, Carla White, Carol Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hurt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 0:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Steven Wallace and Carol Wallace
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Wallace et al
as 9:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Lewis
Defendant:
Carol Wallace, Jackie Wojeski and John Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. Synovus Financial Corp
as 3:2010cv02344
Plaintiff:
David Marshall , Kelley Marshall , Judson T Maurer and others
Defendant:
Synovus Financial Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Cardoza v. Carol Wallace
as 10-6444
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS CARDOZA
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROL WALLACE, Warden, Lunenburg Correctional Center
DeSei v. Wallace
as 1:2010cv00140
Petitioner:
Carl Lee DeSei
Respondent:
Carol Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Wallace
as 1:2010cv00142
Petitioner:
George A. Wright
Respondent:
Carol Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
