Cases 11 - 20 of 436
Hawkins v. Fountain, et al.
as 5:2024ct03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Robert Fountain, Fred Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Marquizs Henry
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Nurse Casey Sanford and Dr. Deanna Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagy v. Humboldt County Correctional Facility
as 5:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Casey Tyler Nagy
Defendant:
Humboldt County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey Tyler v. Pamela Rouse
as 24-6061
Plaintiff:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
Defendant:
PAMELA ROUSE, TODD E. ISHEE and JAMES H. CLARE
Walls v. Shack et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Tawanda Shack, Butler, Grayson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURDO v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CURDO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., JACLYN CASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
