Cases 1 - 10 of 16
DIVINCENZO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv16238
Plaintiff:
GIORGIO DIVINCENZO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and CHARLES W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Charles W. Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Smith
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chambers v. Smith
as 1:2020cv00377
Defendant:
Charles W Smith
Plaintiff:
Jason Chambers
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42161
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 4:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00888
Plaintiff:
Charles W Smith
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and SunTrust Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. Rockdale County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2014cv03926
Plaintiff:
Keishaun Moon
Defendant:
Rockdale County Sheriff's Department , Rockdale County , Charles W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
