Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Wright v. The Writers Coffee Shop LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Eva A Webb Wright
Defendant:
The Writers Coffee Shop LLC, Erika Mitchell Leonard, Amanda Hayward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitlock et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv02000
Plaintiff:
Jan Whitlock , Tiffany Liples , Nydia Cartagena and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sanchez
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03152
Plaintiff:
Crista Bell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Church et al v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv04057
Plaintiff:
Shondel Church , Randall Lee Dalton , Dorian Samuels and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri , Eric Greitens , Michael Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. Taylor et al
as 7:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Natasha L Stratton
Defendant:
Crista A Taylor and Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maggie Conners v. David Alfred Tjarks et al
as 2:2017cv01245
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Chemeleski, Honorable Judge Chemeleski, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Maggie Conners
Chung et al v. The RealReal, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Alexa Chung , Anastasia Kolganova , Astrid Baarsma and others
Defendant:
The RealReal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Whitlock et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01913
Plaintiff:
Jan Whitlock , Tiffany Liples , Nydia Cartagena and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
