Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 115
Harris v. Rambosk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00017
Plaintiff: Robert Dale Harris
Defendant: Kevin Rambosk, Kasey P. Wingo, Michael D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCain v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00005
Plaintiff: Steven McCain
Defendant: Frank Shaw and D. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff: Cavin Earl Reed
Defendant: Frank Shaw, J. Wash, D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. M.T.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00998
Plaintiff: Louis Elliott
Defendant: M.T.C., D. Chapman, N. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph D. Chapman v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH D. CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee: ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
Chapman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07160
Plaintiff: Katie D. Chapman and Ronald Chapman
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Davis v. Police Dept City of Monroe, et al
as 16-30455
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER DAMONE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF MONROE, CITY OF MONROE, JOHNATAN D. CHAPMAN and others
Chapman v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv04004
Plaintiff: Darcy D. Chapman
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chapman v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00679
Plaintiff: Joseph D. Chapman
Defendant: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Monroe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02590
Plaintiff: Christopher Damone Davis
Defendant: Police Dept City of Monroe, City of Monroe and Johnathan D Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?