Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sposato v. Ryan
as 24-536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPOSATO
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. RYAN, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL G. CAREY, -, individually and in his official capacity, JED HUDSON, individually and in his official capacity and others
Sposato v. Carey et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Richard Sposato
Defendant:
Paul G. Carey, Jed Hudson, John Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALBERT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00263
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDER and MEDICAL AND CLINICAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES
Plaintiff:
ALLAN D. ALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckman v. Davis et al
as 5:2017cv02479
Plaintiff:
Henry A Beckman
Defendant:
Warden Davis, Lieutenant Chestnut, Sergeant Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert et al v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Frankie D. Albert and Phylis Albert
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army and Wounded Warrior Project, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Albert Vein Institute, P.C. et al v. Rocky Mountain Vein Institute Professional, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Vein Institute Professional, LLC , Gordon F. Gibbs and Erin Gibbs
Plaintiff:
Albert Vein Institute, P.C. and James D. Albert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Joseph v. Albert et al
as 8:2014cv04720
Plaintiff:
Marcus Albinus Joseph
Defendant:
D Albert and Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv01707
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Shelly D Albert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Albert v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00125
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Shelly D Albert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
