Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOYLE v. STILLABOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Defendant:
TYLER STILLABOWER and BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOYLE v. SCHERSCHEL
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Defendant:
JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Millsaps et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Brianna Millsaps and David Doyle
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keefe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Keefe, Ana Acevedo, Audrey Throckmorton and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24107
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Allstate Texas LLoyd's
as 4:2021cv00679
Defendant:
Allstate Texas LLoyd's
Plaintiff:
David Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doyle v. Riverside Recovery Service, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv05881
Defendant:
AMY SMART, TODD WELLS, AMY WILFONG and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
David Doyle v. Shore Funding Solutions Inc.
as 2:2019cv09781
Defendant:
Shore Funding Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goertzen v. Bagley et al
as 6:2019cv00257
Defendant:
Judge Beth Bagley, % David Doyle Deschutes County and Deschutes County Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
Niklas Goertzen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
