Cases 1 - 10 of 73
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31741
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Ramos v. Comerica Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv06843
Plaintiff:
David Ramos
Defendant:
Comerica Incorporated, Curtis C. Farmer and James J. Herzog
Ramos v. Goodman
as 1:2023cv04762
Petitioner:
David Ramos
Respondent:
Superintendent Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Jones v. David Ramos, et al
as 23-11823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DWYON JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RAMOS, RODGER BERLYNE, PATRIENA SENITA ALLEN and others
Galindo v. Walden
as 7:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Ramos Galindo
Defendant:
Judge Missi Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
David Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-5 and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Defendant:
David Ramos, FNU Berlyne, Patriena Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMETRIUS D BELLAMY v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D Bellamy
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD, WARDEN CHERYL STEBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Comer et al v. Seitz et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marvelous Comer, DiAndre Willis, David Ramos and others
Defendant:
Collins Seitz, The New Castle County Superior Court, New Castle Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
