Cases 1 - 10 of 66,767
Davis v. Franklin Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Franklin Correctional Institution, Region 1 Pharmacy and FNU Pawkk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack et al v. United Carrier Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01744
Plaintiff:
Desiree Mack and Carmela Davis
Defendant:
United Carrier Inc and Sharaf Osman Sabriye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Fraser v. Fraser
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Laura Lawton Fraser
Defendant:
Wyman Davis Fraser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Cromar v. Davis County Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Paul Kenneth Cromar
Respondent:
Davis County Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Davis
as 2:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ahmyri M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Caplan v. Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60677
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. and MKZ Davie Commerce 2, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
James-Davis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
as 3:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jolinda James-Davis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc doing business as Walgreens Store #10193
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
