Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Hill et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08915
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill and Allen McPherson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drewry v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 15-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ELISABETH LAMSON, Health Services Administrator, ROBERT CLINTON, Regional Medical Director and others
Interested Party:
JANET T. MILLS, Attorney General
DREWRY v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
BRANDON B DREWRY
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ELISABETH LAMSON, ROBERT CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Hill et al
as 1:2012cv00708
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Hill, Deborah Hill, Community Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hill v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02880
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Springer v. Perryman et al (MAG+)
as 3:2011cv00936
Plaintiff:
Jacob C. Springer
Defendant:
Steve Perryman , John A. Tinney , Deborah Hill Biggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04081
Plaintiff:
LAINA HILL and DEBORAH HILL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill-Floyd v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04585
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill-Floyd
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
