Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Spalding v. Kang et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
John K. Spalding
Defendant:
Je Suk Kang and Dianne Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Yonkoske v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv02661
Plaintiff:
Dianne Lee Yonkoske
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00175
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.961 Acre, +/-, in Johnston County, North Carolina, PIN No. 09-H-15-010-M, Described as Tract 1 in That Certain Deed Recorded in DB 2605, P. 113, Instrument No. 59667 et al
as 5:2019cv00521
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Monica Diann Lee and 0.961 Acre, +/-, in Johnston County, North Carolina, PIN No. 09-H-15-010-M, Described as Tract 1 in That Certain Deed Recorded in DB 2605, P. 113, Instrument No. 59667
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.961 Acre, More or Less, in Johnston County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 09-H-15-010-M, and Described as Tract 1 in Deed Book 2605, Page 113, Instrument No. 59667 et al
as 5:2018cv00306
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.961 Acre, More or Less, in Johnston County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 09-H-15-010-M, and Described as Tract 1 in Deed Book 2605, Page 113, Instrument No. 59667, Monica Diann Lee and Paula Lee Frazier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Lee v. Smith County, Texas
as 2:2011cv00518
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Brenda Diann Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 601
Compton et al v. St. Louis Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2011cv01975
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Compton , John Mills , Jung Moon and others
Defendant:
The Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department , St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department , Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-2096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Petitioner:
HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant:
CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner:
HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant:
CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner:
HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant:
CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
