Cases 71 - 80 of 1,019
Dobbs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
John C Dobbs
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pickard v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kyle Pickard
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Mark Dobbs, Shane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickard v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kyle Pickard
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Mark Dobbs, Shane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noa v. Playa Miami LLC et al
as 1:2023cv21274
Plaintiff:
OJANI NOA
Defendant:
PLAYA MIAMI LLC, SHAKI DOBBS, MADISON HOWEL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States v. Kasper Dobbs
as 23-1568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Amigon v. Luzon
as 23-387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Xavier Amigon
Defendant / Appellee:
Dylan J. Luzon, Police Officer, Police Officer Michael F. Diglio and Village of Dobbs Ferry
Defendant:
Unknown, Supervising Police Officer and Dobbs Ferry Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
(PC)Cobbs v. Kern County et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Leanard Cobbs, Jr.
Defendant:
Kern County, J. Dobbs, B. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 3:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
