Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DIPIETRO v. CITY OF OCEAN CITY et al
as 1:2025cv05986
Plaintiff:
PETER DAMIEN DIPIETRO
Defendant:
CITY OF OCEAN CITY, OCEAN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OCEAN CITY MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIPIETRO v. CITY OF OCEAN CITY et al
as 2:2025cv00397
Plaintiff:
PETER DAMIEN DIPIETRO
Defendant:
CITY OF OCEAN CITY, OCEAN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OCEAN CITY MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker et al v. Interactive Brokers, LLC
as 3:2025cv00185
Plaintiff:
Douglas S. Walker and Technosearch, Inc.
Defendant:
Interactive Brokers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Walker v. Mills
as 2:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Eric L. Mills
Plaintiff:
Douglas Everett Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Sanchez, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-3383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS E. WALKER, JONAS DELAGRANGE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
Sanchez et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tianna Sanchez, Daniel Wayne Seessengood, Douglas E Walker and others
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, Charles Ernest Grassley, John Glover Roberts, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TUCKER v. WALKER
as 1:2020cv00008
Defendant:
DOUGLAS ALBERT WALKER
Plaintiff:
JASON TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Douglas A. Walker, Jr.
as 4:2016mc00740
Respondent:
Douglas A. Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Walker v. Sifuentes et al
as 7:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Walker
Defendant:
Philip Sifuentes, Felipe Gonzalez Jr. and James S. Hales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
