Cases 1 - 10 of 923
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
David Little v. City of Saginaw, MI, et al
as 24-1335
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM LITTLE
Defendant:
CITY OF SAGINAW, MI, JORDAN LADOUCE, Police Officer and STEVEN LAUTNER, Police Officer
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Batchelder v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80311
Plaintiff:
David William Batchelder
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cosgray v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
David William Cosgray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stauffer, et al. v. Matarazzo, et al.
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM STAUFFER and LAURA L. STAUFFER
Defendant:
JUDITH H. MATARAZZO, STATE OF OREGON COURTS, ANNA K. SORTUN and others
David Nation v. Towns County State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10534
Petitioner:
DAVID WILLIAMS NATION
Respondent:
TOWNS COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN
Williams v. Clary et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clary et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosgray v. Massingill
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
David William Cosgray
Respondent:
Billy Massingill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
