Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Le v. Pack et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00598
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Kyle Pack, Ann Davis and Chilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cure JM Foundation v. CureJDM Incorporated et al
as 8:2026cv01942
Plaintiff:
Cure JM Foundation
Defendant:
CureJDM Incorporated and David Anthony Addario, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
David AveryIn re: David Avery
as 26-5586
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ANTHONY AVERY
Respondent:
JOHNNY FITZ, Warden
Scott v. Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2026cv01310
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Scott
Defendant:
Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of the Department of Education and The National Guard Bureau / The Ohio National Guard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Avery v. Fitz
as 3:2026cv00822
Petitioner:
David Anthony Avery
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall Hutchison v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 26-3465
Plaintiff:
RANDALL TYLER HUTCHISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNIT MANAGER HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Leonard Nyamusevya v. Richard Dewine, et al
as 26-1976
Plaintiff:
LEONARD NYAMUSEVYA
Defendant:
RICHARD MICHAEL DEWINE, DAVID ANTHONY YOST, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Colage v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2026cv00850
Plaintiff:
David-Anthony: Colage
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Corporations, Stephen W. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall Hutchison v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 26-3180
Plaintiff:
RANDALL TYLER HUTCHISON
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
