Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
iBall Instruments LLC v. Butler et al
as 5:2021cv00778
Plaintiff:
iBall Instruments LLC
Defendant:
Myron Butler, Mark Robert Davis, David E Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JohnJay Portillo v. Gregory Cunningham, et al
as 16-20633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNJAY PORTILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY E. CUNNINGHAM, DAVID E. MOORE, JOHN DZIEDZIC and others
Portillo v. Cunningham et al
as 4:2016cv00555
Plaintiff:
JohnJay Portillo
Defendant:
Gregory E Cunningham , David E. Moore , John Dziedzic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crabtree v. Holmes et al
as 2:2015cv01548
Plaintiff:
Lloyd H Crabtree
Defendant:
Clifton L Holmes and David E Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Ten Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Six and 00/100 Dollars ($10,896.00) in United States Currency
as 2:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ten Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Six and 00/100 Dollars ($10,896.00) in United States Currency
Claimant:
David E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Patterson Vegetable Company, LLC v. Superior Foods Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv05286
Plaintiff:
Patterson Vegetable Company, LLC
Defendant:
Superior Foods Inc., David E. Moore, Monroe Howser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
