Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Greene et al
as 2:2025cv00359
Plaintiff:
JyJy Jones
Defendant:
Joshua M Greene, John D Servatius, Liem Q Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. David Griffith
as 23-2713
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID L. GRIFFITH
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv01205
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Griffith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02083
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Griffith and David D. Griffith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. David Griffith
as 14-1976
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
David Jermaine Griffith
Reach Commerce LLC et al v. Cinsay Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03861
Plaintiff:
Reach Commerce LLC, David Todd Griffiths, Toddco Management LLC and others
Defendant:
Does 1-25, Christian Briggs, James Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Burgess et al v. Fischer et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lucas Burgess, Lucas Burgess, Angela Burgess and others
Defendant:
Gene Fischer, The Board of County Commissioners of Greene County, Ohio, Eric Prindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
David A. Griffith v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv06299
Plaintiff:
David A. Griffith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Type:
Other Statutes
David A Griffith v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv07862
Plaintiff:
David A Griffith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
