Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Charles Kinney v. Roger Boren, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-17255
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee: ROGER W. BOREN and DAVID LANE
Kinney v. Boren et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv06505
Plaintiff: Charles Kinney
Defendant: Roger W. Boren and David Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flowers v. Dupont et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00263
Defendant: Barrett Boeker, Leslie Dupont, David Lane and others
Plaintiff: James E. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-20758
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lane et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04054
Plaintiff: David Lane and Dee Anne Lane
Defendant: DePuy Products Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Lane et al
as 2:2015cv00038
Defendant: David Lane and David Lain
Plaintiff: Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01115
Plaintiff: David Lane Potts
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23801
Plaintiff: David Lane Potts
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02197
Plaintiff: Barbara C. Lane and David Lane
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Craig v. David Lane, et al
as 14-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON R. CRAIG
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID LANE, KIMBERLY HOUSE, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE INCORPORATED and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?