Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Stowell v. Grey et al
as 5:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stowell
Defendant:
Telly Grey and David Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Kelley et al
as 2:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Gary Chambers
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley , Raymond Nailor , Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaedeke Holdings, et al v. Speed, et al
as 16-6004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAEDEKE HOLDINGS VII LTD and GAEDEKE OIL & GAS OPERATING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM ASHFORD, BAKER PETROLEUM AND INVESTMENTS, INC., TODD BAKER, John Does 9 through 10 and others
Henderson v. Lay et al
as 2:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Harold Henderson
Defendant:
Gayland Lay, David Mills, Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09005
Plaintiff:
Charito N. Mills and David Mills
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew v. Danny Burl, et al
as 15-2076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mu'min Abdulaziz/Askew
Defendant - Appellee:
Danny Burl, Warden, EARU, DeAngelo Earl, Deputy Warden, EARU, David Mills, Building Manager, EARU and others
South Dakota Network, LLC et al v. Oglala Sioux Tribe Utilities Commission et al
as 4:2015cv04089
Plaintiff:
South Dakota Network, LLC and Express Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Oglala Sioux Tribe Utilities Commission, Joe Red Cloud, Ivan Bettelyoun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gaedeke Holdings VIL LTD v. Mills
as 3:2015mc00036
Defendant:
David Mills, Landon Speed , Jim Ashford and others
Plaintiff:
Gaedeke Holdings VIL LTD and Gaedeke Oil & Gas Operating LLC
Gaedeke Holdings VII Ltd v. Mills
as 3:2015xc01286
Plaintiff:
Gaedeke Holdings VII Ltd
Defendant:
David Mills
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
