Cases 31 - 40 of 5,420
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. M. Lopez et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
M Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkhurst v. Shannon, et al
as 24-8017
Plaintiff:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Defendant:
AMERICA STINSON, AKA America Stinton, DAN SHANNON, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution and others
Kirven et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven, Paul A Moreno, Joseph Kanizar and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Derrick Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishburne v. Lavern Cohen
as 0:2024cv01210
Petitioner:
Derrick Fishburne
Respondent:
Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Derrick B. Allen
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
