Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Tiffany Tabares v. City of Huntington Beach, et al
as 19-56035
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, DOES, 1-10, inclusive and ERIC ESPARZA, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY TABARES, individually and as successor-in-interest to Dillan Tabares
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCoy v. Whittington et al
as 5:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Dee Barnett, Julian Whittington, Dillan Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leroy McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spradling v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Dillan Jackson, Caleb Gurdy, Claiborne Co and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Spradling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Oliver et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11365
Plaintiff:
Eric Cannon, Cathy Romine, Stacie French and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Callahan et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12351
Plaintiff:
Pamela Davis, Brian Davis, Leonor Datil and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Worthen v. Gibson
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dillan Worthen
Defendant:
Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newbold v. City of Saint Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01572
Defendant:
John Does #1-5, Randy Jemerson, Gerald Leyshock and others
Plaintiff:
Dillan Newbold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahs v. Swift et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dillan C. Fahs
Defendant:
Gerald Swift, Alicia, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
